Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Sweden: Effects of non-compliance with dismissal regulations
Phase
Employment protection act (1982:80)
Native name
Lag (1982:80) om Anställningsskydd
Type
Effects of non-compliance with dismissal regulations
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
34-36, 38, 39
Description
A dismissal without just cause should be declared null and void by the employer if so requested by the employee, unless the employee is dismissed due to a shortage of work. If there is a shortage of work, the dismissal is null only if the seniority rules on selection are violated. The labour courts settle any disputes over rights and obligations. In addition, economic and general damages can be paid.
Failure to inform and consult trade unions or to give notification to the public employment service does not make the collective dismissals void, but may make the employer liable for fines (about €10–60 per affected employee and the fines increase with the length of the failure to consult and notify).
If an employer fails to comply with a court order declaring a dismissal null and void, the employment relationship is deemed as having been dissolved, and the employer has to pay (additional) compensation to the employee (up to 32 monthly wages).
In 2022 there were some amendments to the law. Firstly, the employment relationship is declared void when a dispute over wrongful termination, meaning the employer no longer must pay the regular wages in anticipation of a court decision. The employee can instead recieve economic support from the regular unemployment insurance. Additonally, the fines were increased to SEK 135,000 for general damages, and in the event of an unlawful dismissal to SEK 190,000. It is still up to the courts to decide in their case law how large the increase will be in general damages for invalid terminations and dismissals. These changes are in effect since 1 October 2022.
Commentary
One of the most common reasons for declaring a dismissal void is inadequate documentation by the employer.
The reform of the Employment protection act in 2022 changed practices in cases of disputes about dismissals. If a dismissal is annulled, the employment will end after the end of the notice period, rather than last until the dispute is finally settled, which is the current practice. Thus, the employer will not have to pay wages during the entire dispute period. Instead, the dismissed employee may seek support from the unemployment insurance fund and, if the employer is bound by the main agreement, a supplementary collectively agreed unemployment insurance fund, which together correspond to 80% of the employee's salary. The changes entered into force on 1 October 2022.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Employer
Involved actors other than national government
Public employment service
Trade union
Court
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
Ius Laboris (2009), 'Collective redundancies guide', Brussels
Clauwaert, S.and Schömann, I. (2013), The crisis and national labour law reforms: a mapping exercise. Country report: Sweden, ETUI
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.