Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Germany: Effects of non-compliance with dismissal regulations
Phase
Employment Protection Act
Native name
Kündigungsschutzgesetz
Type
Effects of non-compliance with dismissal regulations
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
Employment Protection Act, article 3, 17, 18 and 23
Description
Collective redundancies (dismissal of at least 6 employees in companies with 21-59 workers, at least 10% (or 26) in companies with 60-499 workers, or at least 30 dismissals in larger firms) have to be announced to the public authorities and only come into effect if they are approved by the authorities within three weeks time. The law does not foresee any penalties for the employer in case of non-compliance.
Since 2004, the employment protection act only applies to establishments with a minimum of ten full-time workers on permanent contracts. Workers working in the establishment for at least six months who object to their individual dismissal on social grounds may turn to the works council for complaint. The works council shall consult with the employer to find a solution.
In case a works council is not in place the individual worker has to appeal to the labour court.
Commentary
The above derives from the Employment Protection Act as the Work Constitution Act does not foresee the case of non-compliance as the employer is not obliged to conclude a balance-of-interests agreement. However, a social plan has to be agreed upon, either by the works council and management or by an arbitration committee.
In 2021, the Employment Protection Act was amended. More works' council election initiators were granted better protection against dismissals. The new rules apply to the first six employees listed in the works council election as well as works' council election initiators. They cannot be dismissed on ordinary grounds until the invitation to the election meeting. Dismissals are only possible due to extraordinary, special reasons.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Works council
Court
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: 6 Company size: 21 Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
Ius Laboris (2009), Collective Redundancies Guide, Brussels
Alpha Consulting (2003), Anticipating and Managing Change - A dynamic approach to the social aspects of corporate restructuring, European Commission, Brussels
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.