Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Germany: Effects of non-compliance with dismissal regulations
Phase
Employment Protection Act
Native name
Kündigungsschutzgesetz
Type
Effects of non-compliance with dismissal regulations
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
Employment Protection Act, article 3, 17, 18 and 23
Description
Collective redundancies (dismissal of at least 6 employees in companies with 21-59 workers, at least 10% (or 26) in companies with 60-499 workers, or at least 30 dismissals in larger firms) have to be announced to the public authorities and only come into effect if they are approved by the authorities within three weeks time. The law does not foresee any penalties for the employer in case of non-compliance.
Since 2004, the employment protection act only applies to establishments with a minimum of ten full-time workers on permanent contracts. Workers working in the establishment for at least six months who object to their individual dismissal on social grounds may turn to the works council for complaint. The works council shall consult with the employer to find a solution.
In case a works council is not in place the individual worker has to appeal to the labour court.
Commentary
The above derives from the Employment Protection Act as the Work Constitution Act does not foresee the case of non-compliance as the employer is not obliged to conclude a balance-of-interests agreement. However, a social plan has to be agreed upon, either by the works council and management or by an arbitration committee.
In 2021, the Employment Protection Act was amended. More works' council election initiators were granted better protection against dismissals. The new rules apply to the first six employees listed in the works council election as well as works' council election initiators. They cannot be dismissed on ordinary grounds until the invitation to the election meeting. Dismissals are only possible due to extraordinary, special reasons.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Works council
Court
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: 6 Company size: 21 Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
Ius Laboris (2009), Collective Redundancies Guide, Brussels
Alpha Consulting (2003), Anticipating and Managing Change - A dynamic approach to the social aspects of corporate restructuring, European Commission, Brussels
While large-scale redundancies at major manufacturers dominate the headlines, the true impact of this restructuring is being felt most acutely within the wider supply chain. This article examines the uneven distribution of job losses, the growing geographical shifts in production, ...
Eurofound’s ERM restructuring legislation database offers an overview of key restructuring-related regulations in the EU Member States and Norway. Its content is continuously updated to reflect any changes made by national legislators in response to, for instance, policy shifts, legal ...
Can Europe still achieve its ambitions for battery manufacturing? To answer this, the article looks at data from Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor and explores what recent large-scale restructuring events reveal about the state of play in the EU battery sector.
This working paper offers a comprehensive methodological overview of the European Restructuring Monitor (ERM) databases. Even though the methodology has not changed over time, new categories have been added, and the way it has been used by researchers and policymakers ...