Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Finland: Effects of non-compliance with dismissal regulations
Phase
The Employment Contracts Act (55/2001), Cooperation Act (1333/2021), Act on Cooperation within Government Agencies and Institutions (1233/2013), Act on Cooperation […] within Municipalities (449/2007)
Native name
Työsopimuslaki (55/2001), Yhteistoimintalaki (1333/2021), Laki yhteistoiminnasta valtion virastoissa ja laitoksissa (1233/2013), Laki työnantajan ja henkilöstön välisestä yhteistoiminnasta kunnissa (449/2007)
Type
Effects of non-compliance with dismissal regulations
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
55/2001: Ch. 12, Sec. 2. 1333/2021: Ch. 6, Sec. 44-45. 1233/2013: Ch. 7, Sec. 43-45. 449/2007: Sec. 21-23
Description
The Employment Contracts Act sets the regulation for compensation for an employer’s wrongful termination of an employment contract. An employer who terminates an employment contract against the conditions set by legislation, or who has caused the employee to end the contract through disrespecting employment legislation, may have to reimburse the ex-employee with a sum corresponding to a minimum of three and a maximum of 24 months' salary. For employee representatives, the sum may correspond up to 30 months' salary. The reimbursement sum will depend on:
the estimated length of unemployment and estimated loss of earnings;
the duration of the employment relationship;
the employee's age and employability/employment prospects within a relevant field and at a relevant level of education;
the employer's procedure in terminating the contract;
in case of a fixed-term contract, the remaining period of the contract;
any potential motive for termination originating in the employee;
the general circumstances of the employer and the employee;
other relevant aspects.
Furthermore, if cooperation negotiation procedures during restructuring are not respected, the employer may be liable to pay an affected employee a compensation of up to €35,000 (indexed). This applies to private companies with 20 employees or more. For local governments the maximum compensation level is €30,000 and for state employers and employees, the maximum compensation sum is €34,140. The compensation sum will depend on the degree of neglect towards negotiation procedures, the general conditions of the employer, and the duration of the employee's employment contract as well as the nature of the measure that affects him/her. An employer can in addition be liable to a fine by, in other ways, breaching the obligations to co-operate.
Employees can take action against non-compliant employers through trade union representatives and the courts. The indemnification expires if no action is taken within two years of the employer's breach against contract termination conditions.
Commentary
Trade unions generally offer legal support to their members in case of employer non-compliance with dismissal regulations.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Employer
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Court
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
Ius Laboris (2009), Collective Redundancies Guide, Brussels
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.