Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Finland: Definition of collective dismissal
Phase
Co-operation Act (1333/2021), Act on Cooperation within Finnish and Community-wide Groups of Undertakings (335/2007), Act on Cooperation within Government Agencies and Institutions (1233/2013), Act on Cooperation […] within Municipalities (449/2007)
Native name
Yhteistoimintalaki (1333/2021), Laki yhteistoiminnasta suomalaisissa ja yhteisönlaajuisissa yritysryhmissä (335/2007), Laki yhteistoiminnasta valtion virastoissa ja laitoksissa (1233/2013), Laki työnantajan ja henkilöstön välisestä yhteistoiminnasta kunnissa (449/2007)
There is no official definition of 'collective dismissal'. The four acts referred to here define the terms of dismissal and other cooperation procedures in different types of organisations. The employer is obliged to negotiate with the employees whenever the employer considers measures which may lead to notice of terminations or lay-offs and affect one or several employees.
The employer must give notice before the start of the cooperation negotiations so as to allow the employee representatives to properly prepare for the negotiations. The negotiations are generally carried out between the employer and employee representatives, but also the concerned employee(s) may participate. The employer must provide the employee representatives with:
information regarding the grounds of the intended measures;
initial estimates of numbers of employees affected;
principles determining which employees will be affected; and
a time estimate of the implementation of the measures.
The employer must also notify the public employment services (PES) of the intended measures, and in cooperation with the PES investigate available public services to support employment. At the end of the cooperation negotiations, the employer must present a report on its intended actions to the employee representatives.
There is no strictly defined minimum for company size or number of employees affected for a collective dismissal. Previously, companies employing at least 20 employees had to follow a cooperation procedure for a dismissal to be valid, while smaller companies were not bound by this obligation. The minimum negotiation period varied with company size and the number of affected employees.
From 1 July 2025, legislative amendments to the Finnish Cooperation Act (Yhteistoimintalaki, 1333/2021), raised the threshold from 20 to 50 employees for full application of the Act, while companies with 20–49 employees must comply with certain obligations. Minimum negotiation periods are now 7 days or 3 weeks, depending on the matters to be negotiated and company size.
Commentary
The amendments coming into effect from 1 July 2025 aim to reduce administrative burdens and improve all companies’ ability to respond to changes in their operating environment, with future changes potentially addressing board-level employee representation.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
National government
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
Watson Wyatt (2006) Employment Terms &Conditions Report Europe Volume I, Brussels, Belgium
While large-scale redundancies at major manufacturers dominate the headlines, the true impact of this restructuring is being felt most acutely within the wider supply chain. This article examines the uneven distribution of job losses, the growing geographical shifts in production, ...
Eurofound’s ERM restructuring legislation database offers an overview of key restructuring-related regulations in the EU Member States and Norway. Its content is continuously updated to reflect any changes made by national legislators in response to, for instance, policy shifts, legal ...
Can Europe still achieve its ambitions for battery manufacturing? To answer this, the article looks at data from Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor and explores what recent large-scale restructuring events reveal about the state of play in the EU battery sector.
This working paper offers a comprehensive methodological overview of the European Restructuring Monitor (ERM) databases. Even though the methodology has not changed over time, new categories have been added, and the way it has been used by researchers and policymakers ...