Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Norway: Algorithmic management
Phase
Control measures in the undertaking
Native name
Kontrolltiltak i virksomheten
Type
Algorithmic management
Added to database
28 October 2023
Article
Working Environment Act 2005, chapter 9
Description
LAST UPDATE 2023 - THIS CONTENT WILL NOT BE UPDATED
This chapter contains regulations setting limits and procedures for the application of control measures in undertakings. The employer may only implement control measures in relation to employees when such measures are objectively justified by circumstances relating to the undertaking and it does not involve undue strain on the employees (section 9-1). Such measures should be discussed with the employees' elected representatives as early as possible. The obligation to discuss covers both the needs, design, implementation and major changes (section 9-2).
Before a measure is implemented, the employer has a duty to inform the employees affected of the purpose of the control measure, practical consequences and duration. The measure should further be evaluated regularly (section 9-2).
Further, the chapter gives more detailed regulations in some areas. The employer is not allowed to request health information from persons applying for a position, exceeding information necessary for performing the job
Commentary
The regulations are supplemented by the the EU regulation 2016/679 GDPR, and the regulations are partly overlapping. WEA chapter 9 mainly give regulations concerning what control measures that can be implemented, while the GDPR gives regulations on how data collected as part of these measures should be handled.
Research into the application of the regulations indicates problems when it comes to compliance with the regulations (Bråten et al. 2023). Among the companies that have safety delegates or union reps, 36 per cent indicate that safety delegates were involved in the decision-making phase in the procurement of new digital technology, while 34 per cent report that union reps were involved. Many of the businesses that involved union reps or safety delegates in the decision-making also involved them in the implementation. Meanwhile, almost half of the businesses indicate that they have not involved union reps or safety delegates in the process. Businesses’ reported practices in terms of involvement seem to differ considerably from the statutory provisions regarding the introduction of new technology.
There is broad agreement among the business leaders covered by this research that it is important to protect employees’ privacy when introducing digital technology. However, only 58 per cent have told employees what data is collected, and only 46 per cent have discussed the ramifications for privacy with safety delegates or union reps
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
National government
Trade union
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.