Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Greece: Algorithmic management
Phase
Law 4961/2022 (Official Government Gazette A' 146/27.07.2022), "Emerging information and communication technologies, the reinforcing of digital governance and other provisions"
Native name
Νόμος 4961/2022 (ΦΕΚ A' 146/27.07.2022), "Αναδυόμενες τεχνολογίες πληροφορικής και επικοινωνιών, ενίσχυση της ψηφιακής διακυβέρνησης και άλλες διατάξεις"
Type
Algorithmic management
Added to database
25 October 2023
Article
-Law 4961/27.07.2022,
Part A: 'Digital Upgrading of Public Administration',
Chapter B: 'Regulations for the Development of Artificial Intelligence',
Article 5: 'Algorithmic Impact Assessment';
Article 9: 'Obligation to inform on the use of artificial intelligence in the labour sector'
Description
LAST UPDATE 2023 - THIS CONTENT WILL NOT BE UPDATED
The new national law 4961/2022 aims to create an institutional background for the development and use of Artificial Intelligence in the public and private sector, establishing regulations for the formation of appropriate guarantees in terms of: safeguarding the rights of natural and legal persons; strengthening the accountability and transparency in the use of artificial intelligence systems; and complementing the existing institutional framework for cybersecurity.
By virtue of art. 5, any public sector entity using artificial intelligence system (for the process of making or supporting the process of making a decision or issuing an act), before the system starts operating, should prepare an algorithmic impact assessment. During this preparation, the following information shall be taken into account, in particular:
the intended purpose, including the public interest served by using AI;
the capabilities, technical characteristics and operating parameters of the system;
the type and categories of decisions taken, or acts issued with the participation of,or supported by the AI system;
the categories of data collected, processed or entered into the system or generated by it;
the risks that may arise for the rights, freedoms and legal interests of natural or legal persons, concerned or affected by the decision and
the expected benefit derived for society, as a whole, in relation to potential risks and effects that the use of the system may bring, in particular for racial, ethnic, social or age groups and categories of the population such as people with disabilities or chronic diseases.
The obligation to prepare an algorithmic impact assessment, does not replace the obligation to conduct an impact assessment regarding data protection, in accordance with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation.
By virtue of art. 9, any private sector enterprise, as long as it uses an artificial intelligence system, which affects any decision-making process concerning employees or prospective employees and has an impact on their working conditions, selection, recruitment, or evaluation, prior to its first application, is obliged to provide sufficient and clear information to each employee or prospective employee, including at least the parameters on which the decision is based, without prejudice to the cases that require prior information and consultation, and ensure compliance with the principle of equal treatment and anti-discrimination in employment and work on grounds of sex, race, colour, national or ethnic origin, descent, religious or other beliefs, disability or chronic illness, age, family or social status, sexual orientation, gender identity or characteristics.
Commentary
The new national law foresees a number of regulations for the safe use of IT, while focusing on the digital upgrade of the public administration. Both public and private entities that put IT systems into operation should prove the legality of their use, otherwise they are faced with the imposition of administrative and criminal sanctions, as well as with consequences related to the submission of complaints against them before the National Transparency Authority. It is reported that, the passing and implementation of the New Regulation on Artificial Intelligence is expected to expose public bodies and companies to potential sanctions of up to €30,000,000 -or up to 6%- of the total global annual turnover. The sanctions will be imposed by the national competent authority, which – according to the joint proposal of the European Supervisor and the European Council for Personal Data (EDPS and ESPD) – is expected to be the Personal Data Protection Authority for Greece, which has already experience in imposing and measuring such fines under the General Data Protection Regulation.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Companies
Employer
Involved actors other than national government
Other
Involvement (others)
National Transparency Authority, Personal Data Protection Authority
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.